The traditional model of ethical decision making in business suggests applying an initial set of principles to a concrete problem and if they conflict the decision maker may attempt to balance them intuitively. The centrality of the ethical conflict in the accepted notion of “ethical problem” has diverted the attention of moral decision modelers from other ethical problems that real-world managers must face—e.g., compliance problems, moral laxity, and systemic problems resulting from the structures and practices of the business organization. The present article proposes a new model for ethical decision making in business—the Phase-model—designed to meet the full spectrum of business-related ethical problems. Drawing on the dominant moral theories in business literature, the model offers additional strategies for tackling ethical issues beyond the traditional cognitive operations of deductive application of principles to specific cases and the balancing of ethical considerations. Its response to the problems of moral pluralism in the context of decision making lies in its structural features. The model distinguishes between three phases of the decision-making process, each having a different task and a different theoretical basis. After an introductory stage in which the ethical problem is defined, the first phase focuses on a principle-based evaluation of a course of action; the second phase provides a virtue-based perspective of the situation and strategies for handling unsettled conflicts and compliance problems; and the third phase adapts the decision to empirical accepted norms. An illustrative case demonstrates the applicability of the model to business real life.
Type Articles Information Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , October 2000 , pp. 773 - 803 Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2000Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Arrow , K. J. 1973 . Social responsibility and economic efficiency . Public Policy 21 : 303 – 317 .Google Scholar
Baier , A. 1988 . Theory and reflective practices . In Applied Ethics and Ethical Theory , ed. Rosenthal , D. M. and Shehadi , R , pp. 25 – 49 . Salt Lake City : University of Utah Press .Google Scholar
Baier , A. C. 1992 . Hume, David . In Encyclopedia of Ethics , Vol. 1 , ed. Becker , L. C. and Becker , C. B. , pp. 566 – 577 . New York : Garland .Google Scholar